In response to the dust up at the AER I received this from Harvey Dent (aka "Two-Face") via twitter (cc'd to media/blog economics types):

deserves praise. Only academic economist to voice opinion

My response:

Really? I guess I have nothing to lose.

As Nicholas Bourbaki says in his/their anonymous comment on the AER paper, there is a fear of retaliation from the "editors at AER and other members of their networks." See #4 from the paper:

Bourbaki

What in the world is going on? Is economics research such that all of the cloak and dagger is necessary? I can only guess that the answer may be yes. 

Updated with clarification: Another comment by the non-anonymous Brett Matsumoto at the BLS has been submitted to the AER. This comment considers only technical issues and not accusations of misconduct.

Posted in
  1. Tim Haab Avatar

    “I guess I have nothing to lose.”
    There are still those who believe they are not validated as an economist until they hit the AER–or one of the big journals. As a faculty member once said to me when I asked why he was obsessed with getting in the AER: “You already have your JPE.” a) My JPE was a comment, b) The goal of the JPE comment was not to validate myself, but rather make a correction in the hopes of furthering knowledge.
    Maybe that’s why you and I don’t care what we say here…we’re secure enough in whatever level of success we currently enjoy that chasing the elusive AER article has low net marginal value.
    Pissing off other ego-driven economists though–priceless.

  2. John Whitehead Avatar

    tru dat

  3. John Whitehead Avatar

    The opportunity cost of targeting a top 5 journal is quite high for those economists with only warning track power.

  4. David Zetland Avatar

    I’ll take ’em on! Permanent contract and no chance of publishing a water-related piece in AER-anything! ;)

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading