Update on L.A.'s balls:

The benefits are clear, Professor Pradhanang insists, as Los Angeles strives to retain as much water as possible amid the drought. Like other urban cities, such as New York, they also face a constant battle to keep wildlife off the clean water reservoirs, as their feces is the real source of bacteria.

And, though the truck-load of balls cost $34.5 million, it is easily a much cheaper alternative to covering the site in tarps.

But any color would have been better than black.

'As we know, black absorbs heat. So that won't help the thermal blanket,' remarks Professor Pradhanang. 'The key is to keep these balls clean – but that will be a monumental task.' 

via www.dailymail.co.uk

Posted in , ,
  1. Sue Holt Avatar

    The least heat-absorbing color for the balls is dark blue, like the scarves of Tuareg.

  2. willwheels Avatar

    Post and comment of the month!

  3. John Whitehead Avatar

    I added puerile humor to the categories!

  4. Tim Haab Avatar

    Hey, I was just quoting the professor. Any peurility is on the reader.

  5. John Whitehead Avatar

    This is what Mankiw is missing by not having a comments section.

  6. John Whitehead Avatar

    Er, yes.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading