Next Tuesday I get the honor (?) of being a panelist at The Ohio State University Environmental Professionals Network Breakfast Club panel discussion titled "Ohio's Water Resources and Citizens at Risk – Ag-related Practices and Policies to Prevent Harmful Algal Blooms, Post-Toledo."  

I'm on the 'Policy' panel along with a representative from the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation and a representative of the Ohio Environmental Council.  I'm guessing I'm there to serve the Mills Lane role between the farmers and the environmentalists?

They are expecting close to 200 guests including multiple memebrs of the Ohio legislature.  So somehow I have to figure out a way to diplomatically say that phosphorous prices should be higher, renewable fuel standards ethanol mandates should be removed, residential use of phosphorous should be reduced (most residential fertilizer companies no longer include phosporous in their N-P-K formulations, which is why most store labels for fertilizer now read #0# ), municipal run-off needs to be better managed, water treatment needs to be addressed, and while good intentions make me feel all warm and fuzzy, voluntary compliance mechanisms are unlikely to come close to the 40% reduction in Lake Erie phosphorous levels being called for.  Throw on top of that issues of stored phosphorous sinks in soils combined with increased severe Spring rainfall events (should I even bring up Climate Change?) that serve to flush the proverbial phosphorous toilet (I think that was one of Jesus' first proverbs), and an amazing collective aversion to the word 'tax' in Ohio and I'm unlikely to make very many people in the room happy.

But I haven't really decided what I'm going to say in my 5 minutes of opening remarks yet, so feel free to make suggestions in the comments.

*"I can't have an F, I can't have it and I know my parents can't have it. Even if I aced the rest of the semester, I'm still only a B. And everything's ruined for me."

Posted in , , ,
  1. John Whitehead Avatar

    The Breakfast Club? I thought you were there to fill the John Bender role.
    Update: Pardon me, the title didn’t fully register when I wrote this comment.

  2. Tim Haab Avatar

    ” I’m being honest, asshole. I would expect you to know the difference.”

  3. Kevin J. Egan Avatar

    Tim, I think the key is explaining that ALL the tax revenue raised from the phosphorous tax can be recycled right back to the ag. community; of course as long as the subsidies going back do not undermine the goal of the tax. As environmental economists of course we would prefer the subsidies be used to pay farmers to implement best management practices regarding the environment. However as your colleague Brent Sohngen has shown: http://wosu.org/2012/news/2014/10/06/researcher-tax-phopsphorous-reduce-algae-threat-lake-erie/
    a 135% phosphorous tax may lead to the recommended 40% reduction in phosphorous run off and is only $6 per acre for farmers. It looks like the least cost solution, just as every env. econ. textbook discusses. Therefore, I say we offer the ag. community whatever is needed to get the policy implemented. You want $2 back for every $1 raised in tax? Do it! We will give you $5 back for every $1 if you also give up the ethanol mandate. :)
    I say directly ask the farmer rep. how much you need back to get this done? :)
    When a policy ends up being pareto efficient (nobody hurt) than there is no one left to lobby against it. We can design a pareto efficient phosphorous tax. Now we just need some bold elected officials to support it and help us educate the public. What are the odds of that? Well I think getting better, but starting from zero.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading