Skip Sauer:

The WSJ reports that Governor Phil Bryant is allocating $15 million from Mississippi’s share of BP oil spill damages to be invested in a minor league ballpark in Biloxi. The city itself has voted to issue $21 million in bonds backed by stadium revenues, but the deal apparently hinged on the state’s investment of BP funds.

Biloxi’s population has declined 10% (to 45,000) since Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and the 2010 oil spill must have added to the economic destruction. But BP’s oil spill didn’t ruin baseball in Biloxi — it damaged the beaches, the livelihoods of fishermen, and so on. It’s a stretch to take BP’s settlement money and pour it into new stadium construction.

A counter-argument might be that building a baseball stadium is the most effective way to stimulate economic development in Biloxi, and generates a higher return on public investment than alternative projects. But it is well known that stadium building is an effect, not a cause, of economic development — see Coates and Humphreys (2000) for example. Nevertheless, the city council’s 5-2 vote approving the stadium project was cheered by “most of the 150 residents and business owners” attending a recent meeting.

No doubt there are real benefits to be realized from this project, although the fact that outside funding is required suggests they may total less than the costs. I’d wager that the Beau Rivage Resort and Casino, on whose land the stadium will be built, is the primary beneficiary, and an active political player in the deal to approve it.

For those with a WSJ subscription, here is the gated link to the story. This link to the WSJ stream may be accessible for a while as well.

via thesportseconomist.com

Posted in ,
  1. willwheels Avatar

    BP set aside money to promote tourism, I would guess this money comes from that (see p. 2 of
    http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/gulf-of-mexico/Gulf_Progress_Fact_Sheet_V9.pdf).

  2. John Whitehead Avatar

    I don’t doubt that it is within the rules but I don’t think a minor league baseball game is the primary reason for a trip to Biloxi. And, like the literature says, a new stadium doesn’t drive the local economy.

  3. willwheels Avatar

    Agreed and agreed. (Why do people go to Biloxi?) I was mostly responding to the second paragraph of the quote: the tourism money does not lower the amount given to restoration or private claims.

  4. John Whitehead Avatar

    Right on, the sports economist missed the part about boosting tourism.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading