There may be an economic cure for the nation’s obesity: Hike the price of food.

Raising the price of a calorie for home consumption by 10 percent might lower the percentage of body fat in youths about 8 or 9 percent, according to new research from the National Bureau of Economic Research.

via www.washingtonpost.com

On March 9, 2006, over SEVEN YEARS AGO, I wrote in this very space:

I think… the main cause of the upward trend in
weight in the U.S…FOOD IS CHEAP and getting cheaper.  I present as
exhibit A the graph on the right.Food_prices_1  
The graph maps the relative price of food (as measured by the BLS
Consumer Price Index for all food realtive to the overall CPI for all
goods) from 1980-2005.  As you can see, food prices have fallen
dramatically since 1980 relative to other goods.  The economist in me
says "Hmmmm…food is getting cheap relative to other goods, maybe
people are eating more."  But the story gets better.

If we look at the price of 'fats and oils', 'sugar and sweets' and
'fruits and vegetables' relative to 'All foods', again we see a not so
surprising result (see the other graph to the right).Food_prices_2_2   The
prices of fats and sweets have fallen since 1980 relative to all foods
while the prices of fruits and vegetables have risen dramatically. 

So why are people gaining weight?  Sure part of it might be genetic
or social or environmental, but I think it's equally plausible that the
reason is economic.  If the price of food falls relative to other goods,
and the price of fatty and sweet food falls relative to other foods,
what would you expect?  People will substitute eating fat and sweet
foods for more expensive alternatives like eating fruits and vegetables
and exercising.**

Why do we care?  The CDC estimates that Medicaid and Medicare
expenditures for overweight and obese people were between $25 and $50
billion in 1998.  Can anyone say 'Fat Tax'?  I'm now ducking.

Posted in , , ,
  1. Richard Gerome Avatar

    The price of cheapness
    There are some important aspects lacking in the story—primarily, that food prices have fallen because of Farm Bill subsidies. An example of the political desirability of the Farm Bill is the recent fiscal cliff scare of $7/gal. milk. This problem was quickly fixed in an enthusiastic show of bipartisanship to avoid the politically unpopular reality of constituents having to pay true market prices for agricultural goods.
    Bottom line: “Raising the price of food” is not an appropriate economic aim because economists should not assume that a free market exists in which to apply policy interventions. Rather, they should recognize and scrutinize the existing pro-business, anti-free-market distortions before exploring any countervailing intervention. There is likely some wisdom in letting the market determine prices, production levels, and ultimately, the price of a calorie. You may still duck because reducing subsidies remain as unpopular as raising taxes.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading