I was surprised to hear that the local ski resorts had a good 2011-12 season, in spite of the warm winter:

Whether this winter turns out to be warm or cold, scientists say that climate change means the long-term outlook for skiers everywhere is bleak. The threat of global warming hangs over almost every resort, from Sugarloaf in Maine to Squaw Valley in California. As temperatures rise, analysts predict that scores of the nation’s ski centers, especially those at lower elevations and latitudes, will eventually vanish.

Under certain warming forecasts, more than half of the 103 ski resorts in the Northeast will not be able to maintain a 100-day season by 2039, according to a study to be published next year by Daniel Scott, director of the Interdisciplinary Center on Climate Change at the University of Waterloo in Ontario.

By then, no ski area in Connecticut or Massachusetts is likely to be economically viable, Mr. Scott said. Only 7 of 18 resorts in New Hampshire and 8 of 14 in Maine will be. New York’s 36 ski areas, most of them in the western part of the state, will have shrunk to 9. …

The most basic strategy for coping with a lack of snow is to make it, and as of the 2009-10 season, 88 percent of resorts belonging to the National Ski Areas Association were doing so. Improvements in snow-making technology have helped resorts compensate for warming trends, and several have invested millions in new energy-efficient tower guns.

via www.nytimes.com

I hesitated to post this since we were scooped by Kahn, who points out:

  1. the lack of skiing opportunities is not a huge concern on the demand side of the market as there are a number of alternative activities in the choice set
  2. snow making is an important adaptation strategy
Posted in ,
  1. Ryan Stevens Avatar

    Prof. Whitehead,
    One thing that I’m uncertain about with saying adaptation strategies will counteract the negative impacts of climate change, is it seems that snow-making, as an example, is a very inefficient strategy from an environmental sustainability standpoint relative to operating naturally existing ski slopes. These ski operators have invested a massive amount of immovable capital, lifts, buildings etc., with much lower operating and maintenance costs, allowing snow-making to be economical. However, from an environmental standpoint, it redistributes water in a way that causes massive changes in water table levels and also uses large amounts of energy, compounding air pollution issues, especially since most of these machines run on diesel. This seems to be an example of how frictions in capital mobility can cause adaptation strategies to have negative externalities which sometimes get masked in these discussions. Thanks for linking to this, I do quite enjoy the blog.

  2. chriss1519 Avatar

    this is really depressing. i wish i hadn’t read it.
    it’s happening so fast. and will get faster.

  3. Frank Avatar

    Go nuclear, young man, go nuclear!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading