I've been replying to the email version of comments on my posts and just realized that they haven't been showing up on the blog. This used to work, right? Ugh.What sort of evil Typepad "new editing tool!" change did I miss?

I'm not sure how far back this has been happening but here are some recent comments on your comments:

  • To Flerg: Note that efficiency has little to do with equity. I would rather pursue efficient transport and environmental policy and then redistrbute income directly to achieve some sort of equitable outcome.
  • To Brad: "Support all estimate products they used to support"?
  • To RJS: Well, it still makes some sense with the odd word.
Posted in
  1. Brad Gentner Avatar

    Well, when I first posted that they weren’t supporting mode level estimates. They do now. They still don’t have directed effort code worked out. While they don’t support that in their web queries, it is a product in use by the councils and one they haven’t addressed.

  2. rjs Avatar

    i’ve used that email reply at economists view with no problems…but mark does have threaded replies in his comment sections…

  3. Flerg777 Avatar

    Thanks for the response, Prof. I am trying to show that equity is a factor in efficiency, hence my continual cry to mitigate impacts to poor people.
    When poor peoples’ more valuable dollars are lost to something that makes their dollars less valuable, efficiency is lost. Progressive tax policies aren’t right simply because they are more equitable; they are also right because they tend to be more efficient (both in the use of less-valuable dollars and in the ability to collect).
    Now, if you are mitigating impacts through redistribution, I’ll support it, in part because it is more equitable, and in part because it is more efficient. Sadly, those components don’t tend to make the cut.

  4. John Whitehead Avatar

    I think of efficiency and equity and totally separate, but but
    worthy goals. Sometimes they may conflict, sometimes they may be
    able to coexist but it is hard to think of them as one and the same.

  5. Flerg777 Avatar

    Prof., thanks for the response. Please, however, read mine: Nowhere did I say that equity and efficiency were “one and the same.” To imply that I said that actually looks a tad cheap.
    What I said was that equity is a factor in efficiency. If I could show you a Venn diagram, they would be two big, distinct circles that overlap a bit.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Environmental Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading